January Simone Rampelli 1 * Diederik Pomstra 2 * Monica Barone 3 Marco Fabbrini 1,3 Diederik Pomstra 0 1 3 Silvia Turroni 0 3 Marco Candela 0 3 4 Amanda G. Henry 0 1 3 Amanda G. Henry 0 3 List of Abbreviations: 0 3 (FaBiT), Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna , 40126 Bologna , Italy Department of Archaeological Sciences, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University , Leiden Microbiomics Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DiMeC) , Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna , 40138 Bologna , Italy Unit of Microbiome Science and Biotechnology, Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology 2024 8 2024 13 31

*These authors contributed equally to the work

gut microbiome paleodiet old friends wild foods
Netherlands

CAG GM

PCoA

WF co-abundance group gut microbiome principal coordinate analysis wild foods 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 The composition of the gut microbiome (GM) affects human health and varies among lifestyles. Adopting more “traditional” diets could lead to substantive and health-associated changes in the GM. However, research has focused on diets including domesticated foods. For most of our evolutionary history, humans consumed only wild foods. We explored the impact of a wild-foodonly (WF) diet on the GM composition. One participant collected daily fecal samples and recorded daily food consumption over an eight-week period, the middle four weeks of which he consumed only wild foods (nuts, fruits and leafy greens, wild deer, and fish). Samples were profiled through 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and the species identified by oligotyping. The WF diet altered the GM composition, and the magnitude of the changes is larger than in other diet interventions. However, no new GM taxa, including “old friends” appeared; instead, the relative proportions of already-present taxa shifted. There is a clear successional shift from the pre-, during- and post-WF diet. The GM is very sensitive to the change from a “Western” diet to a WF diet, likely reflecting the different macro- and micronutrient properties of the consumed foods. 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82

1. Introduction

The gut microbiome (GM) is implicated in maintenance of human health [ 1,2 ]. The composition of this microbial community varies among human populations [3] and is strongly driven by differences in diet, lifestyle and living environment, and less by underlying host genetic differences [4]. More specifically, populations who consume food that is mass-produced, highly-processed and rich in fat and sugar, who have access to healthcare including antibiotics, and whose living and working spaces are often highly cleaned, have GM communities that are characterized by reduced taxonomic diversity and increased prevalence of certain taxa that are associated with inflammation and immune-mediated diseases, such as enterobacteria and mucus degraders [5]. Such populations are often labeled as having a “Western” or “industrialized” lifestyle, contrasting with “rural” or “traditional” lifestyles, which are associated with GM profiles characterized by wider biodiversity, and taxa with healthy functions, such as Prevotella and other bacteria that produce short chain fatty acids (SFCAs)[6].

Given the potential health benefits of a more diverse GM, several studies have explored how diet alterations might change GM profiles within individuals instead of among populations. Individuals accustomed to a “Western” diet and lifestyle who then relocate to an area with a more “traditional” way of life quickly acquire a more diverse GM with health-associated taxa [7]. The inverse is also true [8]. Even in the absence of a geographic change, changes to diet alone can cause significant alterations to the GM [9,10], including increasing biodiversity and the ratio of health-associated taxa. However, these diet intervention studies so far have generally remained within the realm of “Western” diets, which rely on foods from a restricted range of domesticated plants and animals. For most of the evolutionary history of our species, humans consumed only wild plant and animal foods. While the actual food items varied through time, both seasonally and over millennia, and across the many habitats in which our ancestors lived, the general composition of the diets was strikingly different from the diets consumed today, even among most “traditional” populations [11]. For example, meat from wild game has less saturated fats and more unsaturated fats than does meat from domesticated animals, while wild plants generally contain more fiber and fewer simple sugars, though overall are more variable than domesticated crops [11]. Given the link between diet and GM, and between GM and health, some have argued that returning to a diet like those of our ancestors might have health benefits. We therefore explored, in a single individual, the consequences of a wild-food-only (WF) diet on GM composition. Fecal sampling was performed daily over 8 weeks, the middle four weeks of which the participant consumed only wild food items. This is not a study of the PaleoDiet, which relies on domesticated foods and combinations of food 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 items that would never have been available to any human ancestor in one place at one time [11]. Instead, we focused on wild (non-domesticated) foods that were available in autumn in northern Europe. Furthermore, this study isolated the effect of diet compared to other factors, such as hygiene and exposure to other people. The test subject remained living in his own house, interacting with family members, and performing other normal daily activities.

In particular, we sought to explore the following three questions. First, does adopting a WF diet influence GM composition and the prevalence of health-promoting species? Second, are there any old friend species that increase in abundance during the WF diet? Old friend species are taxa that likely have been part of the human GM in our ancestors well prior to the adoption of agriculture [12], but that are regularly not found in “Western” populations [3,13,14]. Given their long history with humans, we expect them to prefer diets like those seen in hunter-gatherer populations. Finally, do the microbiome modifications persist even after returning to a ‘normal’ diet? Previous studies indicate that some elements of the GM community reverted to the previous composition, while others remained in the altered state [2].

2. Materials and methods
2.1 Experimental design

One of us (DP) who is an experienced forager of local wild foods collected daily stool samples during an 8-week period from 2018-09-14 until 2018-11-08. The first two weeks consisted of a normal diet, followed by four weeks of a WF diet, and a further two weeks of a return to a normal diet. The wild foods were prepared using “primitive” technologies - they were cooked on an open, wood fire and processed using grindstones and flint flakes instead of modern kitchen utensils, with the exception of a meat grinder. Other aspects of the author’s lifestyle remained unchanged; he performed his usual daily activities, continued living in his house, and interacted as usual with family members. In short, this study isolated the effects of a dietary alteration. The author is of Dutch ancestry, and at the time of the experiment was 46 yo, 1.82 m tall, and weighed approximately 76 kg. The author’s weight was measured daily, and he had daily contact with a medical doctor to monitor his health and well-being during the experimental stage. All consumed food and beverage items, except water, were recorded in a daily food log. The food items in the normal diet and in the wild-food-only diet are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Ethical evaluation of the project was conducted by the Ethics Committee of the Faculties of Humanities and Archaeology at Leiden University (Letter number 2022/23). 2.2 Fecal collection, DNA extraction and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 Kingdom), a disposable paper device to prevent sample contamination, and SMART eNAT® (Copan SpA, Brescia, Italy) for fecal sampling and preservation. These were sent on ice to the laboratory of the Unit of Microbiome Science and Biotechnology at the University of Bologna for further analysis. All specimens were stored at -20°C until processing. Total microbial DNA for each fecal sample was extracted through a method combining bead-beating and column purification, as described previously [15].

The V3–V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified and library preparation was performed following the 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation protocol (Illumina) and the Nextera technology to index libraries. Indexed libraries were pooled at an equimolar concentration of 4 nM, denatured, and diluted to 5 pM prior to sequencing on an Illumina MiSeq

2.3 Bioinformatics and biostatistics analysis of GM data

All sequences were processed using a pipeline that combined PANDASeq [16] and QIIME 2 [17]. After filtering the reads by length and quality, DADA2 was used to identify the amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) [ 18 ]. Taxonomic classification was performed using the VSEARCH algorithm [ 19 ] on the SILVA database (December 2017 release) [ 20 ]. Chloroplast, mitochondria, unknown, and eukaryote sequences were removed. Oligotyping [ 21 ] was then used for clustering the high-quality filtered fasta sequences from the QIIME 2 pipeline as previously illustrated by de Goffau and colleagues [ 22 ]. In particular, we used the ‘Minimum Entropy Decomposition’ (MED) option for sensitive partitioning of high-throughput marker gene sequences from the oligotyping software with the options -M 100 (to define the minimum abundance of an oligotype) and -V 2 (to define the maximum variation allowed in each node). The final node representative sequence of each oligotype was used for species profiling using the VSEARCH algorithm and the Genomes from Earth’s Microbiomes (GEM) catalog [ 23 ] as reference database. Alpha diversity was calculated using the number of observed ASVs, the Shannon index and the Faith phylogenetic diversity index. For beta diversity, the UniFrac dissimilarities were used to construct Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) plots.

Biostatistics analysis and graphical representation were performed in R using the base, vegan [ 24 ] and made4 [ 25 ] packages. Data separation in the PCoA was tested using a permutation test with pseudo-F ratios (function adonis in vegan). Kruskal-Wallis tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 used to assess significant differences in alpha diversity and taxon relative abundance between groups. P-values were corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure. A false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

2.4 Network analysis

Species-level bacterial co-abundance groups (CAGs) were identified as previously described [ 3,26,27 ]. Briefly, the associations among taxa were determined using the Kendall correlation test, visualized with an heatmap and a hierarchical Ward-linkage clustering based on Spearman correlation distance metrics. The network plots were created using Cytoscape [ 28 ]. Circle sizes were proportional to species- or genus-level abundance or overabundance, and connections between nodes represented positive (gray) or negative (red) significant correlations. Keystone species were identified taking into account the topology of the network and the relative abundance of each taxon. Specifically, keystone nodes were identified by looking at the combination of the highest values of closeness centrality, betweenness centrality and degree on Cytoscape as previously described [ 29,30 ] and selecting only the taxa with a mean relative abundance > 1%.

2.5 GM across lifestyle, dietary habits and geography

GM dynamics observed in this research were compared to the results from other studies on (i) travelers in a setting with a traditional diet and lifestyle [7], (ii) people that radically changed their diet to a completely plant-based or animal-based diet [9] and (iii) Western or traditional populations [ 3,14,31–41 ].

Data from [7] and [9] were directly downloaded from the Qiita website [42], selecting the tables “55266”, “63513” and “63516”. Each table contained the OTU abundance obtained using the QIIME pipeline with the closed-reference approach and the Greengenes database (version 13_8). Only the longitudinal samples from travelers and from people that radically changed their diet to an exclusively plant-based or animal-based diet were retained. Samples from our study were reanalyzed using the same parameters reported into the Qiita website and then merged in a new space and graphical representations were obtained using vegan.

For the meta-analysis using data from previous studies on subjects from different geographical locations following different subsistence strategies, we analyzed paired-end sequences using QIIME 2 [17]. The sequences were taxonomically assigned using the feature-classifier “classify-hybridvsearch-sklearn” option, implemented into the VSEARCH options [ 19 ] of the QIIME 2 pipeline, 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 followed by a “q2-feature-classifier” trained on the SILVA 138.1 database [ 20 ] previously processed with RESCRIPt [43] using the developer’s instructions. The resulting abundance tables, one for each study included, were merged and rarefied, resulting in a total of 966 repository-derived samples [ 3,14,31–41 ] that were then included in the analyses along with the 57 samples generated in this work. The dataset included 407 individuals from present-day tropical and subtropical huntergatherer groups and 24 from Inuit tribes – most of which are undergoing a rapid transition away from their traditional hunter-gatherer diet toward a more “Western” diet – 51 individuals from rural groups practicing small-scale or subsistence agriculture from Africa, South America and Papua New Guinea, 38 individuals from Native American tribes, 12 urban Nigerians and 434 urban dwellers from North America, Europe and Asia.

The PCoA analysis to produce the beta diversity plot was performed using the vegdist function in vegan, computing Bray-Curtis distances on relative abundances at the genus level, considering only genera showing more than 0.2% of relative abundance in at least 3 samples. Compositional data were fit onto the ordination implementing the envfit function in vegan, and only genera with FDRcorrected p-values < 0.001 were plotted.

2.6 Functional inference of GM functions

KO (KEGG ortholog) gene abundances were predicted using the Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt2) software [44] by applying the default parameters, including a Nearest Sequenced Taxon Index (NSTI) value of 2. Significant differences among periods are tested by Kruskall-Wallis test and represented by box plots. For beta diversity, the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was used to build a PCoA graph and the separation verified with a permutational test with pseudo-F ratios (function adonis, in vegan).

3 Results
3.1 Individual experience of the wild-food diet

The main staples of the WF diet were chestnuts and acorns, which had to be shelled and were usually then ground to make porridge. These were supplementented by a few other nuts and seeds (hazelnuts and water lily seeds), a variety of fresh greens, dried berries and fruits, and a small amount of deer meat and ocean fish. During the WF period, DP gradually lost 4 kg, most during the first week of the WF diet. Two kg were quickly regained upon returning to a normal diet. Subjectively, DP became bored with the limited foods available to him, as there was little time to 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 prepare more than very basic meals or to gather foods from a wider area. This likely contributed to the overall caloric reduction and weight loss. During this period, DP kept a vlog of his experiences, which is available on Youtube [45]

3.2 Characterization of the GM during the three dietary periods

In the pre-WF period, the GM was dominated by taxa belonging to the three major humanassociated phyla, i.e., Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. In particular, the most representative families were Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, Bacteroidaceae, Oscillospiraceae, Rikenellaceae and Bifidobacteriaceae (Fig. 1 A), which are commonly found in healthy people living a “Western” lifestyle [46]. Beta-diversity analysis revealed a clear pattern towards segregation of the microbial communities according to the sampling period, as shown by the unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances (permutation test with pseudo F-ratio, p-value ≤ 0.001) (Fig. 1 B-D). During the WF period, the GM configuration became significantly enriched in Lachnospiraceae, Streptococcaceae, Erysipelatoclostridiaceae, Butyricicoccaceae, and Eggerthellaceae and depleted in Bifidobacteriaceae, Rikenellaceae, Oscillospiraceae, of the modifications observed in the WF period returned to initial relative abundance values in the that remained at comparable levels to during the WF period (P < 0.05). The Akkermansiaceae family was even further enriched in the post-WF period compared to the two previous periods (P <0.05). In exploring differences in alpha diversity among periods, we observed a gradual increase of biodiversity from the pre-WF period, to WF and post-WF periods (P < 0.05, Kruskall Wallis test, Fig. 1 F), indicating that the intervention had an effect on the microbiome structure even after its conclusion.

These changes in the proportions of individual taxa were also mirrored by changes in clusters of coassociated bacteria, which is unsurprising given the high level of interdependence within the GM. To characterize these clusters of bacteria, we generated a heatmap based on the Kendall’s tau correlation coefficients between the different 57 genera and species with a minimum relative abundance of 0.1% in at least 20% of samples. We clustered correlated bacterial species into six coabundance groups (CAGs), indicated by different colored squares, whose relationships are represented by a Wiggum plot, where species/genus abundance is proportional to the circle diameter (Fig. 2 A and C). The dominant taxa for each CAG were Blautia (gray), Streptococcus (blue), Coprococcus comes (green), Erysipelatoclostridium (yellow), Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (cyan) 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 and Ruminococcus bicirculans (pink). The topological data analysis indicated that Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Blautia are the two taxa with the highest combination of 1) closeness centrality (0.46 and 0.45, respectively), 2) betweenness centrality (0.04 and 0.03, respectively) and 3) degree (15 and 11 respectively), with a mean relative abundance > 1%. For these reasons they were reported as keystone taxa for the microbial community. The CAGs changed in relative abundance across the three dietary periods (Fig. 2 B). The overabundance plots of the CAG members in the 3 dietary periods showed the emergence of different patterns of correlated microorganisms, which were found to be associated with the dietary periods (i.e., pre-WF, WF and post-WF; Fig. 2 D). In particular, the GM of the pre-WF period was characterized by a F. prausnitzii-centered CAG, with several co-abundant glycan degraders, such as Bacteroides spp. (pectin, mannan, glucan, mucin) and Bifidobacterium (milk oligosaccharides) [47]. One auxiliary CAG was closely correlated to these bacteria and included R. bicirculans, Dialister invivus, Bacteroides stercoris, Romboutsia timonensis and CAG-83 taxon of the Oscillospiraceae family, which are eclectic bacteria with different substrate propensities [48–52].

Conversely, the WF-type GM was found to be centered around the Blautia CAG, which included a plethora of well-known fiber-degrading and SCFA-producing bacteria, such as taxa within the Coprococcus eutactus group, Agathobaculum butyriciproducens group and Lachnospira rogosae group, as well as Blautia, Anaerostipes hadrus, Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans and Lachnobacterium bovis [ 53,54 ]. Strongly associated to this cluster, the increase in members of the C. comes CAG and the concomitant presence of all the other CAGs enriches the WF group with a wider metabolic potential than in the previous period.

As expected, the post-WF period was characterized by an intermediate configuration between the pre-WF and the WF periods, suggesting a reapproach, although not complete, to the initial profile. Indeed, we observed a strong increase of members of the F. prausnitzii CAG, such as Bacteroides spp., to values comparable with the pre-WF period, together with the resilience of some members of the Blautia and C. comes CAGs. Notably, this period was also characterized by a higher abundance of the mucin degrader Akkermansia muciniphila, than the previous two periods.

Unlike the previous CAGs, the Streptococcus and the Erysipelatoclostridium CAGs did not show appreciable variations among the different dietary regimes, but only some relevant associations of specific members to each period. For instance, higher proportions of the proteolytic and animal fatdegrading taxa, such as Alistipes shahii, Alistipes putredinis and Clostridium disporicum were representative of the pre-WF period, whereas higher abundances of the SCFA producers 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327

Eubacterium hallii, Eubacterium ramulus, Streptococcus and Erysipelatoclostridium were characteristic of the WF period [9].

Collectively, the WF consumption caused a deep modification of the GM structure, but the GM nevertheless maintained a relevant level of inertia to partially return to the initial configuration when DP resumed a normal diet. However, there were some traits that differentiated the GM between the pre- and post-WF periods: (i) some members of the Blautia and C. comes CAGs remained at higher abundances respect to the pre-WF period; (ii) the post-WF microbiome was characterized by new traits respect to the initial period, e.g., the higher abundance of A. muciniphila.

Putative functional changes corresponding to the observed taxonomic variations were obtained by inferred metagenomics. Given the changes in individual taxa and CAGs, some of the functional aspects of the GM were altered during the WF period as well. The GM of the WF period showed a higher propensity for starch and atrazine degradation, and phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis, compared to the other periods, as indicated by functional assignment of GM genes using the PICRUSt2 tool (P<0.05, Kruskall-Wallis test) (Fig. 3). These changes seemed to mirror the changes to the diet that included a very heavy reliance on starch-rich nuts (acorns and chestnuts) and reduced consumption of animal products (limited meat and fish, and no poultry, dairy or eggs), which may have increased the need for amino acid biosynthesis. Phenylalanine and tyrosine are both common in milk, eggs, and some meat products, while tryptophan is common in eggs and meats. These food items were limited during the WF period. While atrazine has been banned in the EU since 2004, this herbicide is highly persistent in groundwater [55]. The location where DP acquired the wild leafy greens included field borders and previous agricultural land. Herbicidedegrading microorganisms could be possibly acquired through the ingestion of food sources endowed with these specific microbiome components, allowing their adaptation to environments under xenobiotic threat of anthropic origin [56].

3.3 Diet-induced successional changes and “old friends”

The patterns observed above do not represent a stochastic change to the GM, but instead reflect a distinct successional pattern from pre-WF, to WF, to post-WF diets. The weighted proportion of species maintained, gained and lost in the temporal succession of paired samples revealed a constant ratio of species shared or newly acquired between two consecutive timepoints, while the proportion of species lost decreased slightly but significantly (P<0.05, Wilcoxon test) in the WF and post-WF periods with respect to the pre-WF period (Fig. 4). This result indicates distinct 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 successional dynamics of the GM after the dietary modifications, with the GM keeping more diversity during and after the WF intervention. In particular, we found an increase in the number of persistent species during and after the WF period (i.e., species present in at least 70% of samples for each group). The pre-WF period was characterized by the constant presence of F. prausnitzii, Collinsella, Bacteroides vulgatus, Blautia, Gemmiger variabile group, Christensenella group, Oscillispiraceae F23-B02, Oscillospiraceae CAG-110, whereas the WF period was characterized by group. Finally, the post-WF was characterized by a higher number of persistent species, with the Notably, the list of the resilient taxa of this latter period included both some taxa characteristic of the pre-WF group, consistent with the resumption of a normal diet, but also completely new taxa that emerged after the WF diet (see the paragraph above).

Despite these considerable changes to the GM communities during the dietary shifts, no old-friend taxa, e.g., Treponema, Prevotella and Succinivibrio [3,13,14], increased during or after the WF diet. The GM changes almost exclusively involved the taxa already present into the microbial community, without the addition of new taxa. The most relevant aspect of the GM rearrangement during the transition from a normal to a WF diet was the switch of keystone species (i.e., the most important taxa in defining the microbiome structure as highlighted by network analysis – see Methods for how we identified keystone taxa), from F. prausnitzii to Blautia. This supports the emerging interest in the Blautia genus, which has recently been proposed as a next-generation probiotic candidate, also due to its role in ameliorating inflammatory and metabolic diseases [ 53,57 ]. These changes were also associated with an overall rearrangement of butyrate-producing bacteria, from a configuration dominated by F. prausnitzii to a configuration where the contribution of A. hadrus and E. hallii were more relevant. 3.4 GM shift caused by wild-food diet is larger than in other dietary perturbations Previous studies have explored the changes in GM structure in individuals commonly consuming a Western, industrial diet after adopting a new, more traditional diet while traveling [7], or shifting entirely to a plant-only or animal-only diet [9]. Interestingly, when compared to these, the shift in beta diversity between the initial “Western” diet and a WF-only diet was significantly larger (Fig. 5 A-C, P<0.001 permutation test with pseudo F-ratio and Kruskall-Wallis test). Furthermore, we 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 compared the GM configurations, specifically the genus-level relative abundance profiles, of our entire study to published data from hunter-gatherer, rural agriculturalist and urban-industrial communities [ 3,14,31–41 ]. The PCoA of Bray–Curtis distances showed a clear separation between traditional and urban-industrial GMs, consistent across the different studies (Fig. 5 D). In addition, the samples from our study nested within the other urban-industrial populations, in an intermediate position between the majority of the urban-industrial samples and the GM from Native Americans and rural agriculturists. Together, our analysis highlighted how the changes in diet during the WF period instigated a rearrangement of the individual GM that did not alter in depth the microbiome structure, but acted more on the present species changing their relative abundance.

4 Discussion

These results allowed us to address the three questions raised at the start of our study. First, the adoption of a diet completely lacking in domesticated foods considerably alters the human GM, and these changes are much greater than those seen in other dietary perturbations. This was surprising, given the lack of other changes to the individual’s lifestyle, including the environment and the general exposome, during this period. However, the adoption of a WF diet did not entirely alter a “Western” GM configuration to a “traditional” GM configuration, but represented a new and different arrangement of taxa. This suggests that despite considerable changes to the GM communities and relative frequencies, there remains strong inertia in the overall system, perhaps reflecting the portion of GM that is influenced by other lifestyle factors. There is some evidence for a rearrangement of health-associated taxa, including an increase in Blautia and the corresponding reduction in F. prausnitzii and Bifidobacterium, the latter known to be associated with the consumption of dairy foods [3]. This observation seems to corroborate the adaptive nature of the human GM, able to rearrange its compositional and functional layout keeping the homeostatic balance of the human holobiont in response to dietary shifts. Indeed, according to our findings, functional attributes of the GM community did change during the WF period, probably in response to changes in macronutrient profiles of the diet. Both the WF and the pre- and post-WF diets contained relatively small amounts of animal protein. However, the other micronutrients, including fat sources and sources of carbohydrates differed considerably, and the pre- and post-WF diets contained large amounts of dairy and eggs.

Second, despite the striking changes to the GM, there is no evidence that old friend taxa increased in abundance during the WF period. These taxa were missing in the pre-WF period and did not appear during the dietary alteration. Instead, the changes we observed were limited to abundances Third, some of the GM modifications remained even after returning to a normal diet, indicating that the adoption of a WF-only diet can induce persistent reorganization of the GM community. This altered GM profile in the post-WF period may reflect the flexibility of certain GM communities, and that there is a range of variation in taxa that are equally effective at assisting with digestion of Our study design is limited, focusing on one individual for only a month. Furthermore, the potential effects of the author’s change in mood during the WF diet on the GM remains unexplored. Despite this, the degree of change associated with a WF-only diet was striking in its magnitude, even when compared to other severe dietary interventions such as in [9]. This suggests that wild and domesticated foods have widely divergent properties that can be better utilized by specific GM 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 utensils. normal diets. layouts. of already-present taxa. This suggests that WFs did not introduce new bacterial species into the GM community, despite the use of open-fire cooking and grindstones instead of modern kitchen

Turroni S, Brigidi P, Cavalli A, Candela M. Microbiota–Host Transgenomic Metabolism, Bioactive Molecules from the Inside. J Med Chem 2018;61:47–61. [2]

Gilbert JA, Blaser MJ, Caporaso JG, Jansson JK, Lynch SV, Knight R. Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat Med 2018;24:392–400. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4517. [3]

Schnorr SL, Candela M, Rampelli S, Centanni M, Consolandi C, Basaglia G, et al. Gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers. Nat Commun 2014;5. [4]

Vujkovic-Cvijin I, Sklar J, Jiang L, Natarajan L, Knight R, Belkaid Y. Host variables confound gut microbiota studies of human disease. Nature 2020;587:448–54. [5]

Sonnenburg JL, Sonnenburg ED. Vulnerability of the industrialized microbiota. Science 2019;366:eaaw9255. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw9255. [6]

Turroni S, Fiori J, Rampelli S, Schnorr SL, Consolandi C, Barone M, et al. Fecal metabolome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers: a host-microbiome integrative view. Sci Rep 2016;6:32826. 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 [7]

Ruggles KV, Wang J, Volkova A, Contreras M, Noya-Alarcon O, Lander O, et al. Changes in the Gut Microbiota of Urban Subjects during an Immersion in the Traditional Diet and

Lifestyle of a Rainforest Village. MSphere 2018;3:e00193-18.

[8]

Afolayan AO, Biagi E, Rampelli S, Candela M, Brigidi P, Turroni S, et al. The Gut Microbiota of an Individual Varies With Intercontinental Four-Month Stay Between Italy and Nigeria: A

Pilot Study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021;11:725769.

[9]

David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 2014;505:559–63. [10] Garcia-Mantrana I, Selma-Royo M, Alcantara C, Collado MC. Shifts on Gut Microbiota Associated to Mediterranean Diet Adherence and Specific Dietary Intakes on General Adult

Population. Frontiers in Microbiology 2018;9.

[11] Crittenden AN, Schnorr SL. Current views on hunter-gatherer nutrition and the evolution of the human diet. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 2017;162:e23148. [12] Rampelli S, Turroni S, Mallol C, Hernandez C, Galván B, Sistiaga A, et al. Components of a Neanderthal gut microbiome recovered from fecal sediments from El Salt. Commun Biol 2021;4:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01689-y. [13] Jha AR, Davenport ER, Gautam Y, Bhandari D, Tandukar S, Ng KM, et al. Gut microbiome transition across a lifestyle gradient in Himalaya. PLOS Biology 2018;16:e2005396. [14] Ayeni FA, Biagi E, Rampelli S, Fiori J, Soverini M, Audu HJ, et al. Infant and Adult Gut Microbiome and Metabolome in Rural Bassa and Urban Settlers from Nigeria. Cell Reports [15] Viciani E, Barone M, Bongiovanni T, Quercia S, Gesu RD, Pasta G, et al. Fecal Microbiota Monitoring in Elite Soccer Players Along the 2019–2020 Competitive Season. Int J Sports Med 2022. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1858-1810. [16] Masella AP, Bartram AK, Truszkowski JM, Brown DG, Neufeld JD. PANDAseq: paired-end assembler for illumina sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 2012;13:31. [17] Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al.

Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572

Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 2012;486:222–7. [42] Gonzalez A, Navas-Molina JA, Kosciolek T, McDonald D, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Ackermann G, et al. Qiita: rapid, web-enabled microbiome meta-analysis. Nat Methods 2018;15:796–8. [43] Robeson II MS, O’Rourke DR, Kaehler BD, Ziemski M, Dillon MR, Foster JT, et al.

RESCRIPt: Reproducible sequence taxonomy reference database management. PLOS Computational Biology 2021;17:e1009581. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009581. [44] Douglas GM, Maffei VJ, Zaneveld JR, Yurgel SN, Brown JR, Taylor CM, et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat Biotechnol 2020;38:685–8. [45] Archaeologist Diederik Pomstra’s Wild Food (Palaeodiet) Experiment (part 1): introduction.

2018. [46] Lloyd-Price J, Abu-Ali G, Huttenhower C. The healthy human microbiome. Genome

Medicine 2016;8:51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-016-0307-y. [47] Flint HJ, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Louis P, Forano E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes 2012;3:289–306. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.19897. [48] Taylor H, Serrano-Contreras JI, McDonald JAK, Epstein J, Fell J, Seoane RC, et al. Multiomic features associated with mucosal healing and inflammation in paediatric Crohn’s disease.

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2020;52:1491–502.

[49] Gaundal L, Myhrstad MCW, Rud I, Gjøvaag T, Byfuglien MG, Retterstøl K, et al. Gut microbiota is associated with dietary intake and metabolic markers in healthy individuals.

Food Nutr Res 2022;66. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v66.8580. [50] Salonen A, Lahti L, Salojärvi J, Holtrop G, Korpela K, Duncan SH, et al. Impact of diet and individual variation on intestinal microbiota composition and fermentation products in obese men. ISME J 2014;8:2218–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.63. [51] Ricaboni D, Mailhe M, Khelaifia S, Raoult D, Million M. Romboutsia timonensis, a new species isolated from human gut. New Microbes and New Infections 2016;12:6–7. [52] Atzeni A, Bastiaanssen TFS, Cryan JF, Tinahones FJ, Vioque J, Corella D, et al. Taxonomic and Functional Fecal Microbiota Signatures Associated With Insulin Resistance in NonDiabetic Subjects With Overweight/Obesity Within the Frame of the PREDIMED-Plus Study. Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022;13. potential probiotic properties? Gut Microbes 2021;13:1875796. [54] Vacca M, Celano G, Calabrese FM, Portincasa P, Gobbetti M, De Angelis M. The Controversial Role of Human Gut Lachnospiraceae. Microorganisms 2020;8:573. [55] Jablonowski ND, Schäffer A, Burauel P. Still present after all these years: persistence plus potential toxicity raise questions about the use of atrazine. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2011;18:328–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0431-y. [56] Henry LP, Bruijning M, Forsberg SKG, Ayroles JF. The microbiome extends host evolutionary potential. Nat Commun 2021;12:5141. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-02125315-x.

Safety of Blautia producta DSM 2950. Microorganisms 2021;9:908. [57] Liu X, Guo W, Cui S, Tang X, Zhao J, Zhang H, et al. A Comprehensive Assessment of the

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: AGH, DP, SR, MC; Methodology: SR, MC, DP, AGH; Investigation and Formal Analyses: SR, MB, MF, ST, MC; DNA extraction and library preparation: MB; Sequencing and revision: ST; Bioinformatic analysis: MF; Writing – Original Draft: SR, AGH; Writing – Review & Editing: SR, DP, MC, ST, AGH; Visualization: SR, MC; Funding: MC, AGH.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, grant agreement numbers 677576 (HARVEST: Plant foods in human evolution) and 818290 (CIRCLES: Controlling Microbiomes Circulations for Better Food

Systems). Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest shift. Comparison of microbial communities between fecal samples from pre-WF, WF and post-WF periods, represented by barplots of the family-level relative abundances (A), PCoA plots based on unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances (B,C), and boxplots for intra-group distances (D), bacterial families (E), and alpha-diversity (F). Only bacterial families that showed a significant difference in terms of relative abundance among groups are represented (P<0.05, Kruskall-Wallis test). three dietary periods. (A) A network heatmap based on Kendall’s correlation coefficient and gut microbiome data was generated using the most abundant taxa at the genus or species level across all samples. The most dominant clusters identified are highlighted by different colored boxes and were confirmed by permutation tests with pseudo-F ratios (P<0.05, adonis of the R package vegan). One setting was used for cluster analysis (red dashed lines), which identified six clusters. The F. prausnitzii cluster is highlighted in cyan, the R. bicirculans cluster in pink, the Erysipelatoclostridium cluster in yellow, C. comes in green, Streptococcus in blue and Blautia in gray. The main representative taxa of each cluster are marked with a dot. The keystone taxa for the network structure, as highlighted by the network analysis of betweenness centrality, closeness centrality and degree, are marked with a star. The mean relative abundances for each taxon in the overall cohort are reported next to the taxon name. (B) Cumulative relative abundance of the different groups of taxa among the three periods (* P<0.001, *** P<0.00001; Kruskall-Wallis test). (C) Bacterial network scheme. Only significant Kendall’s tau correlation coefficients were considered. The leading taxa in each network are highlighted. A positive correlation is shown with a gray line and a negative correlation with a red line. Disc size is proportional to the mean relative abundance in the whole cohort. (D) Network plots corresponding to the three periods from the whole cohort analysis, in which disc sizes indicate genus/species over-abundance compared to the average relative abundance in the whole cohort. traits associated with the wild food experience. (A) PCoA using Bray-Curtis distances based on functional abundance of KO genes and (B) boxplots showing significant differences (P<0.05; Kruskall-Wallis test) at pathway level of the KEGG orthology database, as inferred by PICRUSt2. 642 643 644 645 646 647 Weighted proportion of species maintained, gained, and lost in the downstream member of a pair of neighboring samples (* P<0.05, ** P<0.01; Kruskall-Wallis test). The black bar represents the first sample. (B) List of species belonging to the core gut microbiome of pre-WF, WF and post-WF periods. The core microbiome was defined as species present in 70% or more of samples for each group. lifestyle. (A) PCoA based on Bray-Curtis distances of genus-level classification using data from (i) this study, (ii) travelers in a setting with a traditional diet and lifestyle [7] and (ii) people who radically changed their diet to a completely plant-based or animal-based diet [9]. (B) PCoA coordinates on the PCo3 axis discriminated microbiome configurations of the WF period from the rest of the samples (P<0.001, Kruskall-Wallis test). (C) Superimposition of genus-level relative abundance on the same PCoA of Figure 5A reveals the most important taxa leading to the observed separation on the microbiome space (P<0.001). (D) PCoA based on Bray-Curtis distances of genuslevel classification using data from this study and other works on gut microbiome characterization in populations with different geographic origin and lifestyle [ 3,14,31–41 ]. Blue arrows represent genus-level relative abundance superimposition on the PCoA space (P<0.001, permutation test). pre-WF Unweighted UniFrac WF

post-WF (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. ) )

B E % 1 1 ( 2 o C P 0 2 4 6 8 10 pre−WF post−WF

Clostridiaceae

2 ppprr4eere−−−WWH6FFG 8 10

WWHFFG

Butyricicoccaceae

pppooossstt−−t−WWHFFG pprree−−WWFF Peptopsrterpe−rpeWto−cFHoGccaceae

WWFF

WFHG post−WF pospto−sWt−FHG post−WF post−WF 0 SoEbtrgsegeervrethde_clflceaaaccteuearaees

ptoco ASctruetapltiobcaocctecraacceeaaee 8 Eggerftahitehl_lapcdeae 0 2 5 4 160 815 0 3.02 3.54 4.60 4.85 51.00 pre−WF

WF post−WF pre−WF

WF WF pprree−−WWF

F pre−WpRreFu−mHinGococcaceae

LOascchilnloossppiirraacceeaaee

Erysipelatoclostridiaceae

Akkermansiaceae

post−WF WFpost−pWosFt−HG pre−WF pre−WF pre−WF post−WF post−WF post−WF PCo1 (14%) PCo1 (30%)

Bifidobacteriaceae Eggerthellaceae Rikenellaceae

obsReirkv8eende_lfleaaeacteuarees e e a e c a l l e n e k i e c a i r e t c a b o d i f i e a e c ppllrree−−HWGF a

HWGF ppogEosstt−−HWGF

HWWGFF pprree−−WWFF pprree−−WHGF

W post−W−F ppoosstt−−WHreGF p WF post−WF post−WF 0 1 8 6 4 2 0 1 6 4 2 0 0

W − t s o p W−W t−WW e s r o p p

645 8 1505 W − t s o p

W CRliokfaseitntrheid_llipaadcceeaaeere − p 03.0223.45 84 46.0 6s84.5180 ire5.100 0 o

l t 6 c c to a a b BuCtylor4sictircidoicaleccaecaeeaeo shRanikneonne_lelanipctreoapeyif d i W − t s o p

F F F F W−W t−WW 0 22 4 4 6 6 8 810 4.02 2 4.64 6 5.08 105.4 0

0 e a e c a i d i r t s o l e c a c c o c o t p e r t s y r E e a e c a l l e n e k i a e c a l l e h t r e g g 0 1 8 6 4 W − t s o p 5 1 W − t s o p 4 5

HG ib l4 a t post−HG u c 2

A pre−HG

HG post−HG 6 e a 0 e 1 c a c 8 c o c i6 c i r y 4 t u 0 0 1 e a e 8 c a r c a 0 3. e a 0 e 1 c ir84.2 a p s 6 o n h 4 c a L 2 Streptococcus cluster Coprococcus comes cluster Erysipelatoclostridium cluster r e t s u l c a i t u a l c a b il a c e a F r e m t iu s r l

u te c Ruminococcus bicirculans cluster

W FWFFWFF F Rubneribacter ba−denWiensWisWt− WW W rep re− re− sop ts− Cts−ol insel a p p o o

p p e e a a e e e a c ca ec llea lle lla

h e trh tr th e e e re ge ga ea ga ge ge Ellcea Ellace gEllace e n n n e e e k k k i i i *** 0 1 8 6 4 2 2 0 0

e e e a e a a e a e e c e c iac ia c a id id lla ll

e tr tr e n lso lso iken ike F 8 8 0 1 8 6 4 5 1 0 01 1 e 8a8 0 e 1 c a 6cc6 8 o ic 6 4c4 i r y 4 t 2u2 *** 0 5 1 15 1 e a e 8 e e0a 0 a 1e 1 ec e ca a a 8c e8 cc c c a oo i ic6ic id6 ircirc trs ty4ty lo4 uu C B2B 2 0 0 1 1 e ae e ea a ce e8 8 ac c ra a er c tc6te c6 e e a a e e c c ia ia id id r r t t s s lo lo eae11 ea cee ac8a8 cae coccac co6c6 cc totoo ppic tretre4irc4 ssy

t toto2u2 ppB ee PP 00 8 e e a a e e c6 c

a la 8ll le8 e

5 55 e81 e1e1 a8 eaa ee aee ac ecc e caa laccac066e10 0 ce0c10te10

acr lo1e8a 1 ca1oc ecae ee

8 10ceaeca 10 e10

a aa e6 8cc 8 c8 cc a

i oo

d 6icic 6 i6

tr4 cc irir s 4tyty 4 lo4 uu

C 2 2BB 2 2 * 0 1

5 0 02 1 1 ee 0 aa e2 8ee 8 a8

e cc aa rr c5 a1 6tete 6 cc68

8 e e a a e e6 6 c c ia ia ird ir4 4

d t t s s lo lo 5 25 2

0 e ee0 82 e a aa2 a ec ecec ec a aia5 615 a c cs1 i c8cn8 8e8s o oa a n c cm0 410 ce a 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0

WWW t−− − − re re t s s op p o p p

F W WWFWWFW F re− re− −W ts− Wts− −W2 p p re po po ts0 p o

p 0 1 0 1 0 1 e e 2468810 8102468 ttrecccaceapooS2468iceaae810 iaceaedttreccaceacpooS ttrecccaceaepooSiaceead lltreeaceaegghEllceaae lltreaceaeegghEllcaeae lltreaceaeegghEllcaeae 5106801 6810 510littrcaceacaubA510cacceae68810246ccaceaeo 064 640 0iltrsdo64 iltrso iltrso ieekn ieekn ieekn 04 4 00iirccyo4640iitrccy

C C F C RF RFF R FF F t 2 2 WF WWFFWWF2FW2 FFu2 Fu 0 0 e e a a e e c c

a ia i r r

e te t c c a a b b

W F W F FW FFF FFF FF

F

WF

WFFF WFFF

FFFF pMrpe−eocnrpe−Wtiongillyotrpe−CWibcuourpe−Wtspo−spsrgtspo−Worpe−WrcWooupctsop−WcrpeWDutspo−WosrceWatspo−Watustspo−WCoprpe−Brrpe−WloacuoticaWcrpe−Wrpe−Wustspo−Cetspo−WuhWrpe−Wtraiscrpe−WtteuWtsop−Wtspo−WnssgeWrontspo−Wrpe−Wuepl aAtspo−Wrpe−WggWarothrpe−Wurpe−orpe−Wpbtspo−Wactspo−terpe−rrpefatspo−esoptspo−Wcrpe−isrpe−tsop− tspo tsop−rep−tspo−rpe− Wrpe−Wrpe−Wrpe− tsop− Eubacterium coprostanoligenes

Lachnobacterium bovis eCoprococcuscomes 0 a 6 Agathobaculum butyriciproducens group AUcBhAo2l2e8pE86014l4raysgsrm8610iopauetpalliilttrrscaecaeyooda8601ctoeiliittrsceaecadoopcaleosOililittrsceaecaaedooptrsidciiitfrceaeceaabodiiulomAsliiiitfrceaceaeabodsptiirpEaeiiitfrceaceaeaboducsbesaahcea462teCAhSrnA462iitFuraGeume-ps1rhtio1ociraseaeccaopnhL462as0ca18064lirecaseacaponhLtiotiepgcnerciso18064buuahirceaseacapnohLsililttrseaecacaedooppCca18064tdleorrsuililttrseaecacaedoopstsraidciililttrsceaecaaedoopuchLmaadrcivihsoiitfrceaeceaabodnpr40030502aoo040650030nsriiitfraceceeaabodspciuramF462iitfraceceaeabodililraseaeccspoOr400605030aillirceaseacspooegcLoas462alaiccirceaseacaponhehillirceaseacspoOa462gnteroonsirceaseacaponhuappliarirceaseacaponhac18064ctaer18064aise gC81064riillttrseaecaceadoopAo80164601842uGpiillttrseaceaceadoop-45504060030ililttrsceaecaaedoopliitreaacesaDilitraceseaeaD86014 400650030illireacaescspo400650030ilitreaceaesaD F 0 20GaE20strarsyEnaFersyEroBpFhilaBcFeaBegroAup0lis0tipes 0p20utred20FinirsyEis20FCirsyElostFrirsyEidAicuemtasiBt01iaf201auciBdtoiern0iBs201Oe 0FL0 FL L20F 20 20irsyE200 irsyE 201irsyE 20 201O201F FFF FFF FWFF FWFFFFFWFFFF FFFFF FFFF FFFWF

− WWWW−WWtWWWWWW−WWWWWW W WWs WW W − e− op t− t− re r s s p p o o p p

W W W e− F F Ft− FFF FFF FF F e r WParaWbWsoacWteWWroid−WeWWsdWisWtasWonisrp −W p rep− rep− rep−p tsop−rep− tsopreptsop− tsop− tsop− rep

Eu−WbFactWerFiFum−WrFaFmuFluFFFs group

W W W W Wrpe−Wrpe−FWtspotsop−WWrpe−FW rpe−WWtsop−Wtspo−W FWtsop−FWrpe−FW tsop−FWrpe−FWFW rpe−FWrpe−rpe−FWtsop−FWFWtsop−FWFWrpe−FWrpe−FWtsop−FWtspo−tsop−FWFWrpe−FWFWrpe−FWtsop−FWFWtspo−FWFWtsop−FWrep−FWtspo−FWrpe−FW FWrpe−FWrpe−FWrpe− tsop−F Duodenibacil us massiliensis Bacteroides cel ulosilyticus Dialister invisus

Bacteroides stercoris Eggerthel a lenta group

Bacteroides rodentium Dialister invisus

Bacteroides faecichinchil ae Bacteroides caccae Parabacteroides distasonis

Alistipes putredinis

Bacteroides uniformis Gordonibacter pamelaeae

Coprococcuseutactusgroup

Coprococcuscatus Monoglobus pectinilyticus group

Bacteroides stercoris Ruminococcus bicirculans

Christensenel a group

Acetatifactor Lachnospiraceae CAG-45 Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans B pre−WF

WF post−WF pre−WF

WF post−WF pre−WF

WF post−WF pre−WF

WF post−WF pre−WF

WF post−WF pre−WF

WF post−WF ) % 5 1 ( 2 o C P 100 0 pre-WF WF post-WF PCo1 (43%) 18000 18500 19000 19500 Starch_sucrose_metabolism;k00500 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 Valyne_leucine_isoleucine_degradation;ko00280 8000 9000 10000 11000 Glycine_serine_threonine_metabolism;ko00260 15500 16000 16500 17000

Lysine_biosynthesis;ko00310 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Pyruvate_metabolism;ko00620 pre−WF

WF post−WF pre−WF

WF post−WF pre−WF

WF post−WF pre−WF

WF post−WF pre−WF

WF post−WF

5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 C5−branched_dibasic_acid_metabolism;ko00660 4000 2200

4500 5000 5500 Fatty_acid_degradation;ko00071 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200

Histidine_metabolism;ko00340 8000 8500 9000 9500 10000

Phenylalanine_tyrosine_tryptophan_biosynthesis;ko00400 pre−WF

WF post−WF 13000 13500 14000 14500 15000 15500

Secondary_bile_acid_biosynthesis;ko00121 pre-WF pre-WF

Faecalibacterium prausnitzii Oscillospiraceae CAG-110

Collinsella

Bacteroides vulgatus Gemmiger variabile group

Bacteroides cellulosilyticus Eggerthella lenta group Erysipelatoclostridium Coprococcus eutactus group

Eubacterium hallii group Blautia

Dorea

Collinsella

Coprococcus ) Peptostreptococcaceae % Clostridium (7 Prevotella 3 Paraprevotellaceae; Prevotella oC Catenibacterium P

Ruminococcus

Bacteroides pre-WF post-WF d i v a D

[1] Nat Biotechnol 2019 ; 37 : 852 - 7 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [18] Callahan BJ , McMurdie PJ , Rosen MJ , Han AW , Johnson AJA , Holmes SP . DADA2: Highresolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data . Nat Methods 2016 ; 13 : 581 - 3 . https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869. [19] Rognes T , Flouri T , Nichols B , Quince C , Mahé F. VSEARCH : a versatile open source tool for metagenomics . PeerJ 2016 ; 4:e2584 . https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2584. [20] Quast C , Pruesse E , Yilmaz P , Gerken J , Schweer T , Yarza P , et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools . Nucleic Acids Research 2013 ; 41 : D590 - 6 . https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219. [21] Eren AM , Morrison HG , Lescault PJ , Reveillaud J , Vineis JH , Sogin ML . Minimum entropy decomposition: Unsupervised oligotyping for sensitive partitioning of high-throughput marker gene sequences . ISME J 2015 ; 9 : 968 - 79 . https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej. 2014 . 195 . [22] de Goffau MC , Jallow AT , Sanyang C , Prentice AM , Meagher N , Price DJ , et al. Gut microbiomes from Gambian infants reveal the development of a non-industrialized Prevotellabased trophic network . Nat Microbiol 2022 ;7: 132 - 44 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021- 01023-6. [23] Nayfach S , Roux S , Seshadri R , Udwary D , Varghese N , Schulz F , et al. A genomic catalog of Earth's microbiomes . Nat Biotechnol 2021 ; 39 : 499 - 509 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020- 0718-6. [24] Oksanen J , Blanchet FG , Friendly M , Kindt R , Legendre P , McGlinn D , et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2 .5- 6 . 2019 2020. [25] Culhane AC , Thioulouse J , Perrière G , Higgins DG . MADE4: an R package for multivariate analysis of gene expression data . Bioinformatics 2005 ; 21 : 2789 - 90 . https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti394. [26] Claesson MJ , Jeffery IB , Conde S , Power SE , O'Connor EM , Cusack S , et al. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly . Nature 2012 ; 488 : 178 - 84 . https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11319. [27] Rampelli S , Guenther K , Turroni S , Wolters M , Veidebaum T , Kourides Y , et al. Pre-obese children's dysbiotic gut microbiome and unhealthy diets may predict the development of obesity . Commun Biol 2018 ; 1 : 1 - 11 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0221-5. [28] Shannon P , Markiel A , Ozier O , Baliga NS , Wang JT , Ramage D , et al. Cytoscape: A Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks . Genome Res 2003 ; 13 : 2498 - 504 . https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303. [29] Agler MT , Ruhe J , Kroll S , Morhenn C , Kim S-T , Weigel D , et al. Microbial Hub Taxa Link Host and Abiotic Factors to Plant Microbiome Variation . PLOS Biology 2016 ; 14 :e1002352. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio. 1002352 . [30] Tackmann J , Matias Rodrigues JF , von Mering C. Rapid Inference of Direct Interactions in Large-Scale Ecological Networks from Heterogeneous Microbial Sequencing Data . Cell Systems 2019 ; 9 : 286 - 296 . e8 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels. 2019 . 08 .002. [31] Clemente JC , Pehrsson EC , Blaser MJ , Sandhu K , Gao Z , Wang B , et al. The microbiome of uncontacted Amerindians . Science Advances 2015 ; 1:e1500183 . https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500183. [32] Girard C , Tromas N , Amyot M , Shapiro BJ . Gut Microbiome of the Canadian Arctic Inuit . MSphere 2017 ; 2 : e00297 - 16 . https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere. 00297 - 16 . [33] Gomez A , Petrzelkova KJ , Burns MB , Yeoman CJ , Amato KR , Vlckova K , et al. Gut Microbiome of Coexisting BaAka Pygmies and Bantu Reflects Gradients of Traditional Subsistence Patterns . Cell Reports 2016 ; 14 : 2142 - 53 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep. 2016 . 02 .013. [34] Martínez I , Stegen JC , Maldonado-Gómez MX , Eren AM , Siba PM , Greenhill AR , et al. The Gut Microbiota of Rural Papua New Guineans: Composition , Diversity Patterns , and Ecological Processes . Cell Reports 2015 ; 11 : 527 - 38 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep. 2015 . 03 .049. [35] Morton ER , Lynch J , Froment A , Lafosse S , Heyer E , Przeworski M , et al. Variation in Rural African Gut Microbiota Is Strongly Correlated with Colonization by Entamoeba and Subsistence . PLOS Genetics 2015 ; 11 :e1005658. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen. 1005658 . [36] Nakayama J , Watanabe K , Jiang J , Matsuda K , Chao S-H , Haryono P , et al. Diversity in gut bacterial community of school-age children in Asia . Sci Rep 2015 ; 5 : 8397 . https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08397. [37] Obregon-Tito AJ , Tito RY , Metcalf J , Sankaranarayanan K , Clemente JC , Ursell LK , et al. Subsistence strategies in traditional societies distinguish gut microbiomes . Nat Commun 2015 ; 6 : 6505 . https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7505. [38] Sankaranarayanan K , Ozga AT , Warinner C , Tito RY , Obregon-Tito AJ , Xu J , et al. Gut Microbiome Diversity among Cheyenne and Arapaho Individuals from Western Oklahoma . Current Biology 2015 ; 25 : 3161 - 9 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub. 2015 . 10 .060. [39] Smits SA , Leach J , Sonnenburg ED , Gonzalez CG , Lichtman JS , Reid G , et al. Seasonal cycling in the gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers of Tanzania . Science 2017 ; 357 : 802 - 6 . https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan4834. [40] The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. A framework for human microbiome research . Nature 2012 ; 486 : 215 - 21 . https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11209. [41] Yatsunenko T , Rey FE , Manary MJ , Trehan I , Dominguez-Bello MG , Contreras M , et al. [53] Liu X , Mao B , Gu J , Wu J , Cui S , Wang G , et al. Blautia-a new functional genus with o doBarnesiel a intestinih4omip4inisla B id i 2 s e f f i i